Loss autopsy 7 MINS · SHRESTH GOEL · 05 OCT 2026

Policybazaar: Caught in the IRDAI Crossfire?

On 23 September the IRDAI published an eighty-page consultation paper on how insurance gets sold.

The next day Policybazaar lost about ₹31,000 crore on the market.

Almost nothing in those eighty pages says the business is bad. What it does say is that prior reforms have not achieved their objectives for the wider industry.

We agree, but we also believe that Policybazaar will survive this storm - question is what it'll have to become to do so.

COMPANY
PB FINTECH
LOST IN ONE SESSION
≈ −₹31,000 CR
TAKE RATE
≈ 18.5%
RETAIL HEALTH SHARE, FY26
18 TO 20%
Editorial illustration: a long line of people climbs a rocky ramp onto a bridge labelled 'policybazaar', carrying papers towards a stack of health insurance documents marked with a blue shield. On the far side, a giant hand in a suit sleeve reaches out of a domed IRDAI building and pulls a sheet from a towering pile of paperwork, while a city skyline glows at dusk beneath the bridge.

What does Policybazaar actually sell?

Not insurance. It has never carried a rupee of your risk.

What it sells is distribution. It finds the buyer, explains the product, completes the sale and services the renewal. For that, the insurer pays it a commission.

And here is what almost nobody understands about commission.

It is not a fee you pay on top. It comes out of the premiumThe price a policyholder pays an insurer for cover, usually once a year. Commission is paid by the insurer out of this amount. you already paid.

The slice a platform keeps is called its take rate.

Policybazaar's runs at about 18.5%: of every hundred rupees of premium, roughly eighteen and a half stay.

That makes up for about 90% of their revenue.

Is Policybazaar’s business good?

On its operating numbers, yes.

Its share of retail health insurance went from 4.5% in FY22 to between 18% - 20% in FY26. And it did that while its take rate went up, from 17.5% to 18.5%.

The company raised its price and still quadrupled its share.

And if that wasn’t good enough: Insurers judge a book of policies by its loss ratioThe share of premium that comes back out as claims.. A distributor sending bad clients wrecks it. Policybazaar's early mortality, deaths in the first stretch of a savings policy, fell from 14.4 per 10,000 policies to 1.8 in three years.

So not only do they bring customers, but they bring good ones. And the customers stay.

Persistency, the share of policyholders who keep paying year after year, runs at about 89% on health renewals, worth roughly ₹1,126 crore of annualised revenueA recent period of revenue scaled up to a full year. It shows the yearly run-rate of the renewal book rather than a reported annual figure..

What does the IRDAI proposal change for Policybazaar?

The rent.

Think of Policybazaar as a very good shop on a busy street. Loyal customers, well-trained staff, shelves in order. But the shop has never owned the building. 90% of what it earns is a percentage, and that percentage was always set by the landlord.

In September the landlord sent a new lease. It sets a maximum commission for every product, and a different maximum depending on who does the selling.

Health, Policybazaar's biggest engine. By the paper's own count, the average commission brokersLicensed intermediaries who compare and place policies from many insurers on the customer’s behalf. Policybazaar’s insurance arm is a broker. earned on retail health tripled between FY23 and FY25. The proposed ceiling for a platform is 15% on a first sale and 5% on a renewal now.

Motor. Third-party cover, the part the law makes you buy, drops to nil on a new vehicle and 2.5% on an old one, after going up 5x in two years.

And to add pain to the misery,

Every cap is lower for a company than for an individual. An agent selling a first-time health policy can earn 20%. A platform selling the same policy to the same customer gets 15%.

Second, the cap is all-inclusive. Incentives, awards, reimbursed selling costs, "brand value" payments and gifts all count.

A salary cap that also counts the company car and the Diwali bonus. Yikes, imagine that.

IRDAI's proposed maximum commissions. On every health and motor line, a distribution entity such as a platform is capped below an individual agent selling the same product. Every cap is lower for a company than for an individual Proposed maximum commission, % of premium, distribution entity vs agent Platform (distribution entity)Agent 0510152025%1520Healthfirst sale75%510Healthrenewal50%510Motor ODnew vehicle50%1015Motor ODold vehicle67%2.55Motor TPold vehicle50%nil2.5Motor TPnew vehicle0%platform cap as % of the agent’s IRDAI consultation paper, Box 4A, 23 September 2026. Ratio row is our arithmetic.
Figure 1. IRDAI's proposed maximum commission for a distribution entity against an individual agent, selected health and motor lines. OD is own-damage cover; TP is third-party cover. Figures are the proposed ceilings as a percentage of premium, from Box 4A of the consultation paper. The ratio row is our arithmetic.
Show the full table · 6 rowsHide the full table
LinePlatformAgentPlatform as % of agent
Health, first sale15%20%75%
Health, renewal5%10%50%
Motor own damage, new vehicle5%10%50%
Motor own damage, old vehicle10%15%67%
Motor third party, old vehicle2.5%5%50%
Motor third party, new vehicleNil2.5%0%

Are commission caps the only thing changing?

No. And the other clause may matter more.

Take Expenses of Management, or EoM, a ceiling on an insurer's total costs as a share of premium.

General insurers run at 32.1% today and must reach 20% within five years, roughly 38% of the cost base gone. Staff, technology and claims are fixed. Commission is the one line that flexes.

So, the squeeze on Policybazaar lands twice. 15% is a ceiling, not a promise. An insurer squeezed by its own budget will pay whatever it can get away with below it.

Why did IRDAI change the rules?

Because, from where it sits, the market underneath did not.

In April 2023 IRDAI scrapped the product-by-product commission caps and left insurers with one overall spending ceiling. Like a parent swapping a list of rules for a monthly allowance and trusting the child to budget.

As expected, and the paper says as much itself, the 2023 reforms "have not achieved their dual objectives" of better value for policyholders and wider coverage.

In life insurance sold through corporate agentsCompanies, such as banks and NBFCs, licensed to sell policies for a limited panel of insurers, often alongside their own products like loans., new premium grew 28% between FY23 and FY25 while distributor pay grew 125%. Through general insurance brokers, premium grew 37% and commission 173%.

Remuneration, the paper says, is growing four to five times faster than the business it is paid on.

Between FY23 and FY25, distributor pay grew 125% against 28% premium growth in life corporate agency, and commission grew 173% against 37% premium growth through general insurance brokers. Pay grew four to five times faster than the business Growth FY23 → FY25: life via corporate agents 28% vs 125% · general via brokers 37% vs 173% Premium growthDistributor pay / commission growth 050100150200%+28%+125%Life insurancethrough corporate agents4.5x+37%+173%General insurancethrough brokers4.7xpay growth ÷ premium growth IRDAI consultation paper, 23 September 2026. Multiples are our arithmetic.
Figure 2. Growth in premium against growth in what distributors were paid, FY23 to FY25, in two channels named in the consultation paper. Growth figures are as printed in IRDAI's consultation paper. The multiples are our arithmetic and sit within the paper's own "four to five times" description.
Show the full table · 2 rowsHide the full table
ChannelPremium growthPay growthMultiple
Life insurance via corporate agents+28%+125%4.5x
General insurance via brokers+37%+173%4.7x

More money, roughly the same customers.

The regulator's case, then: distribution spend was not buying reach, and it was not buying customers who stayed. Whatever you make of the remedy, the diagnosis is well evidenced.

It also explains why the company is capped below the individual. The paper wants more feet on the ground. To quote the paper:

"To expand insurance, it is necessary to expand the agency force."

Will the IRDAI proposal work?

Strip the paper to its purpose and it targets three things: mis-selling, low penetration and affordability. Held against its own proposals, it seemingly does about half the job.

  1. a)

    Mis-selling: yes, with teeth. SuitabilityWhether a product actually fits the buyer’s needs and means. The paper wants that judgement recorded for every sale. must be documented. Commission is clawed back where mis-selling is established. Every policy carries the identity of the person who sold it. And insurance can no longer be made compulsory with a loan.

  2. b)

    Penetration: partly, by implication. Cheaper distribution, cheaper premiums, more buyers. A chain of three links, and the paper directly controls only the first.

  3. c)

    Affordability: not really. The paper caps what distributors are paid and what insurers spend. Nothing in the proposals as drafted obliges an insurer to lower a premium. Cutting the waiter’s pay does not shrink your bill unless the restaurant passes it on.

What about everyone else on the street?

Policybazaar is the biggest tenant. It is not in the worst unit.

Turtlemint does not sell to you at all. It runs an app through which hundreds of thousands of part-time sellers, called Point of Sale Persons (PoSPs), sell insurance in their own neighbourhoods. About 90% of its revenue is general insurance, mostly motor, where the caps bite hardest.

InsuranceDekho runs the same kind of network and sits in the same bind. In FY25 it paid its agents ₹836.8 crore on revenue of ₹1,290 crore and slipped to a ₹47.5 crore loss.

Then there are tenants who own their buildings: insurers, who pay commission rather than earn it. For Acko, Go Digit or ICICI Lombard, a cap is a rent cut. The day PB Fintech fell, ICICI Lombard rose 5.1%. Same paper, opposite side of the lease.

What can Policybazaar do now?

Three doors, and only one is interesting.

  1. a)

    Buy the building: become an insurer. But due to regulations (surprise surprise) Policybazaar can send its own insurer at most a quarter of its business. A supermarket allowed to fill only a quarter of its shelves with its own label. All of the conflict, a quarter of the prize.

    The record elsewhere is thin.

    Check24, a large German comparison site, took a banking licence instead and was ordered to stop the one time it carried insurance risk.

    At home, Paytm's 2020 deal to buy the general insurer Raheja QBE was called off in 2022.

    Even a born insurer takes years: Acko spent about $458 million and nearly a decade before its first annual profit, in FY26.

    So far, no comparison platform we could find, in India or abroad, has turned itself into a successful insurer. Some tried. Most groups that owned both halves chose to split them.

  2. b)

    Run the kitchen instead: become a managing general agent (MGA). An MGA works for the insurer rather than the customer. It prices, underwritesDecides whom to insure, on what terms and at what price. It is the insurer’s core judgement about risk. and binds cover on the insurer’s paperUnder the insurer’s licence and balance sheet. The policy is the insurer’s, and so is the risk, even though the MGA did the pricing., while taking none of the risk. It earns a fee plus a share of the underwriting profit it generates. December 2025's amendment to the insurance laws wrote MGAs into Indian law for the first time.

    Commission pays for volume. A profit share pays for quality of risk.

    Guess which a platform with great risk selection like Policybazaar would rather be paid on.

    The catch is that the rules for it do not exist yet.

  3. c)

    Or charge the customer directly. "Opaque commissions paid by insurers and unknown to policyholders" to a fee paid by policyholders directly.

The open question

The franchise is real. 40% of India's new retail health cover does not run through one company by accident.

But every rupee of it arrives as a percentage somebody else now sets, and the paper does not just change the number.

It changes how you may find the customer, who pays the salesman, and whether a cheaper counter opens across the street.

The question is not whether this business survives the reform.

It is what it has to become to do it.

About the author

Shresth Goel

One of our writers at Thinq. Shresth read Politics at King's College London, followed by stints at Kotak Mahindra Bank, Bank of America, and a climate-tech startup in London. He is a CFA Level 3 candidate, and thinks of ripping businesses apart as a relaxing hobby. Why? We can't say. What we are certain about is that he reads the fine print so you don't have to! 

If you liked the story above, know that this one took an eighty-page regulatory paper and two annual reports. The next one gets the same treatment. We publish company analysis, weekly trade post-mortems, and plain-language explainers of the mechanics nobody teaches. All free, all on the website first.

Get it in your inbox →

Or take it where you already are

  • Telegram: every post the moment it goes live, plus a discussion group.
  • Discord: where the working-out happens. Charts, questions, the arguments we didn't publish.
  • LinkedIn · X: the short-form cuts.
  • And if you think we got something wrong, shoot us a message on Discord and if you've got a point, we'll publish the argument ;)
SHARE

FAQ

1. What does Policybazaar actually sell?

Not insurance. It sells distribution: it finds the buyer, explains the product, completes the sale and services the renewal, and the insurer pays it a commission out of the premium the customer already paid. The slice it keeps, its take rate, runs at about 18.5%, and commission makes up about 90% of its revenue.

2. Is Policybazaar's business doing well?

On its operating numbers, yes. Its share of retail health insurance went from 4.5% in FY22 to between 18% and 20% in FY26 while its take rate rose from 17.5% to 18.5%. Early mortality on its savings policies fell from 14.4 to 1.8 per 10,000 in three years, and health renewals run at about 89%.

3. What does the IRDAI proposal change for Policybazaar?

It caps the commission Policybazaar can earn on every product. For a platform, health is capped at 15% on a first sale and 5% on a renewal, and third-party motor cover drops to nil on a new vehicle and 2.5% on an old one. Every cap is lower for a company than for an individual agent, and the cap includes incentives, awards and gifts.

4. Why did IRDAI change the rules?

In April 2023 IRDAI scrapped product-by-product commission caps, and the paper says those reforms have not achieved their objectives. Between FY23 and FY25, life premium through corporate agents grew 28% while distributor pay grew 125%, and general insurance premium through brokers grew 37% while commission grew 173%: four to five times faster than the business.

5. Will the IRDAI proposal work?

On mis-selling, it has teeth: suitability must be documented, commission is clawed back where mis-selling is established, and every policy carries the seller's identity (summary of the proposals). On penetration, only partly and by implication. On affordability, not really, because nothing in the proposals as drafted obliges an insurer to lower a premium.

6. What can Policybazaar do now?

Three doors. It can become an insurer, but regulations limit how much business it could send its own insurer to a quarter, and no comparison platform we could find has made that work. It can become a managing general agent and earn a share of underwriting profit, but the rules for that do not exist yet. Or it can charge the customer a fee directly.